Powered By Blogger

Saturday, December 31, 2011

The GOP War on Democracy: How Conservatives Shamelessly Disenfranchise People Who Vote Democrat

The GOP War on Democracy: How Conservatives Shamelessly Disenfranchise People Who Vote Democrat

Is the Thought of "American Exceptionalism" A Trap?


American Exceptionalism

      By now I am sure that everyone has heard the epression "American exceptionalism" and I am equally sure that ir sounds beautiful rolling off the tip of your tongue. But does the term really carry the meaning you think it does? Well, let's examine it. First, just the core word "exception" should give us pause to think about the meaning of this well sounding phrase. To be an exception means to be outside the regular rules of order. It suggest that those who apply this phrase to themselves feel that they are an "exception" to the rules. So for America to be exceptional means that we have the right to violate the laws we expect the rest of the civilized world to follow. We can do whatever we want, without impunity. If you think I've got it wrong, just look at the interview of one of those who believe in "American exceptionalism". On Meet the Press, New year's Day, this past Sunday former senator Rick Santorum's rantings tells you that if by any stretch of the imagination he becomes president, we will be in perpetual war from now until eternity because any country that we feel the least bit threatened by, we have the right to bomb them, as is the case with Iraq and Iran, Syria, and Libya. Is that what we think of our country? They try to fill us with fear saying that if Iran is successful in obtaining the bomb that they would be foolish enough to use it. Do you really believe that? I would make the case that throughout the GWB and Cheney administration this was definitely the mindset when you look at how they tried to bully the U. N. to go along with them to war in Iraq. Remember 'freedom fries' and Americans should no longer buy French wines? When they couldn't coerce any other nations to go along with them they began to call the U. N. obsolete. But it was just they who felt that way about the U. N. The majority of the American public still believed in the U. N.'s role in the world and still do today. So they put together a small group of almost nonexistent nations and went to war even though the whole world was against it. Now that's excetionalism with a capital "E". With America doing 99% of the heavylifting in this so-called "coalition of the willing", we spent nearly ten years in that country with no visible results except destablizing what little stability they had.
      And now under President Obama this same thing is beginning to happen in Syria and Libya (destabilization) now that khadaffy is gone and they are pushing for the removal of Mr. Bashir in Syria. The leaders of Pakistan are beginning to distance themselves from the U. S. because of the problems our drone attacks have caused between them and their citizens. Even Russia is becoming destabilized because of our covert efforts in that country. It almost seems that only the countries who have refused any assistance from us are still relatively at peace. Is that what we want from our American "exceptionalism"? When you look it from this standpoint it seems like "American arrogance", "Nationalism".
      Uh Oh! I know, I really did it now!! I'm unpatriotic!! Well that is not my intention. I'm just pointing what seems to be right in front of our faces. Here's a good example. In Germany during the Nazi years, Hitler raised the German people to fever pitch with his talk about "German superiorty". Remember how they were humbled when a lone black man, a man that he considered less than a man, won four gold Medals at the Munich Olympics in 1936 and Joe Lewis defeated Max Smelling for the World Heavyweight Boxing Title? Hitler deceived the German people into thinking they were so (exceptional)superior to everybody else, much like many in this country are doing today. Telling them that they could conquer the world and that the "Third Reich" would last for a thousand years. Kinda sounds like former republican representative Tom Delay who claimed to be securing a permanent republican majority in congress before he was expelled for ehtics violations. Remember that?!
      You probably noticed I used quite a few synonyms for the word exceptionalism; arrogance, nationalism, superiority. That's because those words could be inserted in place of that word if we in America are not careful. Thinking that we are exempt from the rules that everyone else has to follow, can and will, over time cause us to become arrogant just like those example of the past. There are many more such examples throughout history, and if we don't heed history we will repeat the same mistakes.
      Empires come and go and it will be true of our too, someday. The the question is how will America's greatness be remembered? Will our siciety be remembered as a rennaisance society or a war mongering nation that went the way of all the other unjust, arrogant nations that fell violently. Remember, China is growing at an incredible pace and her population is aout four times the size of ours. Will we try and bully that country until we have provoked her into a war that we surely won't win?!! I sure as hell hope not!!

Friday, December 30, 2011

Ron Paul: Sanctions against Iran are 'acts of war'

Ron Paul: Sanctions against Iran are 'acts of war'

Marginalizing Ron Paul

Robert ScheerTruthdig / Truthdig Op-EdPublished: Thursday 29 December 2011
“It is hypocritical that Paul is now depicted as the archenemy of non-white minorities when it was his nemesis, the Federal Reserve, that enabled the banking swindle that wiped out 53 percent of the median wealth of African-Americans and 66 percent for Latinos, according to the Pew Research Center.”
SHARE Email It is of­fi­cial now. The Ron Paul cam­paign, de­spite surg­ing in the Iowa polls, is not wor­thy of se­ri­ous con­sid­er­a­tion, ac­cord­ing to a New York Times ed­i­to­r­ial; “Ron Paul long ago dis­qual­i­fied him­self for the pres­i­dency by ped­dling clap­trap pro­pos­als like abol­ish­ing the Fed­eral Re­serve, re­turn­ing to the gold stan­dard, cut­ting a third of the fed­eral bud­get and all for­eign aid and op­pos­ing the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”

That last item, along with the decade-old racist com­ments in the newslet­ters Paul pub­lished, is cer­tainly wor­thy of crit­i­cism. But not as an al­ter­na­tive to se­ri­ously en­gag­ing the sub­stance of Paul’s cur­rent cam­paign—his dev­as­tat­ing cri­tique of crony cap­i­tal­ism and his equally tren­chant chal­lenge to im­pe­r­ial wars and the as­sault on our civil lib­er­ties that they en­gen­der.

Paul is being den­i­grated as a pres­i­den­tial con­tender even though on the vital is­sues of the econ­omy, war and peace, and civil lib­er­ties, he has made the most sense of the Re­pub­li­can can­di­dates. And by what stan­dard of logic is it “clap­trap” for Paul to at­tempt to hold the Fed ac­count­able for its de­struc­tive poli­cies? That’s the give­away ref­er­ence to the raw nerve that his fa­vor­able prospects in the Iowa cau­cuses have ex­posed. Too much anti-Wall Street pop­ulism in the heart­land can be a truly scary thing to the in­tel­lec­tual par­a­sites re­sid­ing in the belly of the beast that con­trols Amer­i­can cap­i­tal­ism.

It is hyp­o­crit­i­cal that Paul is now de­picted as the arch­en­emy of non-white mi­nori­ties when it was his neme­sis, the Fed­eral Re­serve, that en­abled the bank­ing swin­dle that wiped out 53 per­cent of the me­dian wealth of African-Amer­i­cans and 66 per­cent for Lati­nos, ac­cord­ing to the Pew Re­search Cen­ter.

Most news sources are funded by cor­po­ra­tions and in­vestors. Their goal is to drive peo­ple to ad­ver­tis­ers while push­ing the cor­po­rate agenda. Na­tionofChange is a 501(c)3 or­ga­ni­za­tion funded al­most 100% from its read­ers–you! Our only ac­count­abil­ity is to the pub­lic. Click here to make a gen­er­ous do­na­tion.

The Fed sits at the cen­ter of the rot and bears the major re­spon­si­bil­ity for tol­er­at­ing the run­away mort­gage-backed se­cu­ri­ties scam that is at the core of our eco­nomic cri­sis. After the melt­down it was the Fed that led ul­tra-se­cret machi­na­tions to bail out the banks while ig­nor­ing the plight of their ex­ploited cus­tomers.


To his credit, Paul mar­shaled bi­par­ti­san sup­port to pass a bill re­quir­ing the first-ever pub­lic audit of the Fed­eral Re­serve. That audit is how read­ers of the Times first learned of the Fed’s tril­lions of dol­lars in se­cret loans and aid given to the banks as a re­ward for screw­ing over the pub­lic.

As for the Times’ com­plaint that Paul seeks to un­rea­son­ably cut the fed­eral bud­get by one-third, it should be noted that his is a rare voice in chal­leng­ing ir­ra­tionally high mil­i­tary spend­ing. At a time when the pres­i­dent has signed off on a Cold War-level de­fense bud­get and his po­ten­tial op­po­nents in the Re­pub­li­can field want to waste even more on high-tech weapons to fight a so­phis­ti­cated enemy that doesn’t exist, Paul has emerged as the only se­ri­ous peace can­di­date. As The Wall Street Jour­nal re­ported, Paul last week warned an Iowa au­di­ence, “Watch out for the mil­i­tary-in­dus­trial com­plex—they al­ways have an enemy. No­body is going to in­vade us. We don’t need any more [weapons sys­tems].”

As an­other re­cent ex­am­ple of Paul’s san­ity on the na­tional se­cu­rity is­sues that have led to a flight from rea­son on the part of politi­cians since the 9/11 at­tacks, I offer the Texan’s crit­i­cism this week of the Na­tional De­fense Au­tho­riza­tion Act (NDAA). The act would allow the pres­i­dent to order in­de­ter­mi­nate mil­i­tary im­pris­on­ment with­out trial of those ac­cused of sup­port­ing ter­ror­ism, a pol­icy that Obama signed into law and Paul op­poses, as the con­gress­man did George W. Bush’s Pa­triot Act. Paul said:

“Lit­tle by lit­tle, in the name of fight­ing ter­ror­ism, our Bill of Rights is being re­pealed. ... The Pa­triot Act, as bad as its vi­o­la­tion of the 4th Amend­ment, was just one step down the slip­pery slope. The re­cently passed (NDAA) con­tin­ues that slip to­ward tyranny and in fact ac­cel­er­ates it sig­nif­i­cantly ... The Bill of Rights has no ex­emp­tion for ‘re­ally bad peo­ple’ or ter­ror­ists or even non-cit­i­zens. It is a key check on gov­ern­ment power against any per­son. This is not a weak­ness in our legal sys­tem; it is the very strength of our legal sys­tem.”

That was ex­actly the ob­jec­tion raised by The New York Times in its own ex­cel­lent ed­i­to­r­ial chal­leng­ing the con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity of the NDAA. It should not be dif­fi­cult for those same ed­i­to­r­ial writ­ers to treat Ron Paul as a pro­found and prin­ci­pled con­trib­u­tor to a much-needed na­tional de­bate on the lim­its of fed­eral power in­stead of at­tempt­ing to mar­gin­al­ize his views be­yond recog­ni­tion.

Jesse Jackson, Progressive

Friday, Dec 30th
Last update10:24:34 AM GMT

Add this to your websiteWASHINGTON--(ENEWSPF)--December 29 - Political legend Rev. Jesse Jackson will be joining Jean Ross, co-president of National Nurses United, which is leading the fight for Medicare for all and the financial transaction tax, and Steve Cobble, from the Institute for Policy Studies, for a conversation on progressive theory turned to action. Reverend Jackson has for decades campaigned for open and inclusive politics--outlined a quarter century ago by his "Rainbow Coalition" campaigns of 1984 and 1988.

In 1988, Jackson showed the possibility of this new politics with his bold decision to campaign in the Iowa caucuses. It was a redefining moment in American politics, and it laid the groundwork for progress that would eventually see Iowans provide Barack Obama with the 2008 caucus win that led to his presidency. Now, Reverend Jackson is returning to Iowa to argue for open caucuses, open politics, and democracy.

Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) is sponsoring "Building the Progressive Movement Inside and Outside the Democratic Party," a forum being held on the eve of the Iowa caucuses in Des Moines, Iowa. The event is on Friday, Dec. 30 from 1:30 to 5:30 p.m. at the First Unitarian Church, 1800 Bell Ave., in Des Moines.

Progressive activists, writers, and speakers from Iowa and beyond are participating in sessions moderated by John Nichols, author and writer for The Nation magazine. Panelists include Iowa activists Ed Fallon, radio host/Former Iowa State legislator; Jeff Cox, from Iowa Healthcare NOT Warfare; and Jay Howe, with Iowa People's Alliance.

PDA National Director Tim Carpenter and Deputy Field Coordinator Andrea Miller contribute their experience as progressive activists inside the halls of Congress and outside, creating "street heat."

A reception for the panelists and audience will follow the forum at 4:30 p.m. This free event is open to the public. Sponsors for the forum are Progressive Democrats of America, National Nurses United, and The Nation, with endorsement from the Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa, The Prairie Progressive, the Iowa Healthcare NOT Warfare Caucus Campaign, and the Fallon Forum. For further information, visit http://tinyurl.com/ProgressiveMovementForum or PDA's Website at pdamerica.org.

Progressive Democrats of America is a grassroots PAC that works both inside the Democratic Party and outside in movements for peace and justice. Our goal: Elect a permanent, progressive majority in 2008. PDA's advisory board includes seven members of Congress and activist leaders such as Tom Hayden, Medea Benjamin, Thom Hartmann and Rev. Lennox Yearwood. More info:http://pdamerica.org

What If Everyone Saw This Facebook Status?

What If Everyone Saw This Facebook Status?

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Indiana State Sen. Jim Tomes (R) Comes Out Against Mitch Daniels' Right-to-Work Agenda

Indiana State Sen. Jim Tomes (R) Comes Out Against Mitch Daniels' Right-to-Work Agenda

TV Analysts' Collusion With the Military: Disgraceful but Legal? | Truthout

TV Analysts' Collusion With the Military: Disgraceful but Legal? | Truthout

Take the Prescription Drug Benefit Money and Run

Pharma's Incredibly Shrinking R&D Budget - 12/22/2011 - The Burrill Report

DOD In Control Of Media And Government?

The official line of the pentagon is that Iran is attempting to block the Straits of Hormuz in order to disrupt oil shipping lanes. I, for one have to question this declaration. For one, how would it help Iran to TRY and block the straits? Mr. Ahmedinejad already knows that would cause a confrontation with the U. S. in which the outcome would not be good for him. It would be easier for him to just withdraw Iranian oil from the oil market. That would disrupt the world economy in and of itself. The cause of course, would be the heavyhanded U. S. sanctions against that country. I know many say that those sanction were put in place by the U. N., but it was the U. S. that instigated those actions.
If you look closely at economic sanctions in the past, they have not served our interests well. Contrary to what the news media would have you believe, there is evidence that the people of N. Korea, not just it's leaders, would rather starve that to give in to the demands of the U. S. The same is true of Cuba. Sanctions against that tiny island nation haven't worked for over fifty years. Instead of befriending our neighbor to the south and importing oil from them, we have to import oil from the opposite end of the earth while China reaps the benefits from oil in the Cuban territorial waters. And the same is true of Venezuela. We need a change in attitude towards these two countrise. Instead of trying to force them to do things our way, let's reach out to them and allow them to choose their own destinies. We can gently encourage them rather than impose harsh sanction that don't work. It seems that it would be better to use a carrot than a big stick. Why does our foreign policy have to antagonize just about all countries that export oil unless they allow western oil companies to control their oil? There's a one word answer ,"profits"! Will anyone in government ever admit that the reason for all this turmoil is the desire for oil company profits? I challenge each of you to call your senators and representatives and tell them "NO MORE WARS" for the sake of oil, or any other reason, for that matter
I believe that the State Department has advised against the position that the pentagon has taken, but the Secretary of State, Mrs Clinton has yet to speak out in public. It seems that she is unwilling to speak in opposition to the DOD. That's why the impression persists that the DOD controls the State Department and the rest of government and the media.
Just as in the leading up to the Iraq war, the news medis are trumpeting the claims of the Pentagon even after their claims leading up to the Iraq war proved to be untrue. Now they trumpet unproven allegations again of nuclear bomb construction and blockading waters in order to provoke Iran into war. While I disagree with just about everything Senator Ron Paul ever has to say, I agree with him on this subject and I applaud his courage to stand and say the truth about these wars and the causes for them. Though I definitely won't be voting for you, Senator Paul, my hat's of to you. President Obama I heard you say that you have achieved more at this time in your presidency than all but a few. I challenge you to fight to make a clean break with the recent past in every area of government, especially the Department of Defense. In that way you will ensure one of the greatest presidentail legacies in history.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Pay Your Taxes? These 10 Companies Didn

Pay Your Taxes? These 10 Companies Didn

Propaganda Campaign Against China And Iran

On MSNBC this morning I saw where the poeple in control of the media are now changing tactics in the propaganda war First it was that China was manipulating it's currency in order to ruin our currency. That does not make sense. If that happened China would be the big loser. They are the main debt holders ou the U. S.deficit. Now they admit that this was a lie.
So now they have turned their attention to invading Iran. First it was that Iran is on the verge of having "the bomb". Now they are claiming that Iran wants to blockade oil shipments from the persian gulf. How silly a statement! Mr. Ahmedinejad is not suicidal. There are two objectives to this claim; (1) to keep oil prices propped up and (2) to take control of Iran's oil like they did in Iraq. Make no mistake about it, that is exactly what happened. Now they'll keep putting out charge after charge until they have convinced enough people in goivernment to start a war with Iran even though "we the people" don't want another war. So they keep encouraging Israel to take on the mission of bombing a certain place in Iran, knowing that Iran will respond and that Israel will be helpless if Iran does respond. For one, their aircraft will not be able to return home for lack of fuel. Because this, they say, the U. S. will have to step in and fight on behalf of Israel.
Mr. President, I implore you to fire those around you who counsel this advice to you. We don't need to be involved in yet another war.

The Cost Of Bush Tax Cuts For The Richest 5 Percent: $11.6 Million Per Hour

The Cost Of Bush Tax Cuts For The Richest 5 Percent: $11.6 Million Per Hour: pThe National Priorities Project, in partnership with Citizens for Tax Justice, has released a new site tracking the ever-growing cost of the Bush tax cuts. They found that the tax cuts for only the richest 5 percent of Americans “cost the U.S. Treasury $11.6 million every hour of every day.”/p

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

The president's Poll Ratings

The president's poll numbers are beginning to rise again and I am quite sure that you hnow the reason. It's because he finally decided to fight for us with everything in him. We voted for him as president because we believed he would do just that. During the majority of fights with congressional repubs in the past he has let many of us down immensely. I realize that he can't win all of the fights and even that he has to choose the right battles to undertake, but he just seemed to cave on battle after battle.
Mr President let me remind you of an old saying; "it's not whether you win or not but it's whether you put up your best fight". We never expected you to win them all, but we did expect you to fight to the very end. On the occasion of the health care debate, you easily stopped fighting for universal healthcare. Then in the debate over the public option just when you seemed to have victory in hand, you deflated the whole democratic party when you decided to give up the fight. They were predicting they would have the votes they needed by the next day. It made me so furious! I feel that is the main reason the repubs took control of the house. We have all been demoralized since then. The Tea Party won all those seats because we felt things were hopeless. You then began to cave on issue after issue with barely any fight. They didn't have any mandate! The one we had put our hopes and dreams had sold us out.
They also won the majority because we were stunned by what the dems were doing in congress. They had a super majority but couldn't get anything done. They, along with you, failed us miserably! But now with just one worthwhile fight on your part we stand ready to forgive your past transgressions if you just promise no repeat performances. If you let us down again the way you did in the past, it would probably irreparably damage the democratic party.
So, Mr. President I'm looking forward to fighting many good fights alongside you. I and the the great majority, stand ready to advocate for everything you undertake. But Mr. president if you are only trying to get re-elected,and then just filibuster away the next four years, I can assure you that your legacy nor reputation, won't be AT ALL GOOD. As one of your once most ardent supporters, I am not at all convinced that is not your intentions. I am really skeptical!

Slow Business Is The Job-Killer, Not Government Regulations

Slow Business Is The Job-Killer, Not Government Regulations: pEconomists have debunked the myth that environment regulations stall job growth again and again. Even as Mitt Romney calls to “tear down the vast edifice of regulations the Obama administration has imposed,” data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show regulations haven’t hurt the economy. In 2010, only 0.3 percent of layoffs were due to [...]/p

Monday, December 26, 2011

Better? Defined Benefits VS 401(k)

When Medicare Isn't Medicare | Truthout

Colbert guest editorial: Naming rights, state mottoes and the GOP primary + video - Editorial Columns - TheState.com

Colbert guest editorial: Naming rights, state mottoes and the GOP primary + video - Editorial Columns - TheState.com

Revolving Door Watch: Larry Craig to Lobby for Mining Status Quo | | United RepublicUnited Republic

Revolving Door Watch: Larry Craig to Lobby for Mining Status Quo | | United RepublicUnited Republic

The Problem; Retirement Funded 75 Years Into The Future

Going Postal | Truthout

What Else Would He Say?

Leon Panetta: Military Cuts Mean "Doomsday" for America | Truthout

Irreconcilable Differences

Occupy Wall Street, Mass Media and Progressive Change in the Tea Party Era: Our Window of Opportunity | Truthout

Friday, December 23, 2011

Banks In Control Of Europe

Privatizing Money‏ Newsletters | 12/22/11 From: Alan Grayson (alangrayson@graysonforcongress.com) Sent: Thu 12/22/11 6:09 PM To: jnluv50@hotmail.com WHAT THE EUROPEAN BANKS GOT FOR CHRISTMAS. Dear James: Yesterday, the European Central Bank (ECB) announced that it will hand out $645,000,000,000 in three-year loans to European banks. Which the ECB printed out of thin air, like Monopoly money! The interest rate will be one percent per year. The ECB will not be lending this money to the Government of Greece, even though that government is running a budget deficit of just under 10% of GDP – and the Greek GDP dropped by 5% this year. The Government of Greece is now paying 37% per year on its ten-year bonds, when it can borrow anything at all. The ECB will not be lending this money to the people of Spain, even though official unemployment in Spain is now at 23%. Spain’s Economy Minister said recently that “Spain faces its deepest recession in half a century.” Tough luck; their Christmas tree has nothing under it. And when the European banks get this $645 billion, to whom will the banks be lending? Anybody, or nobody. No strings attached. They can borrow from the ECB at 1%, lend it back to the German Government at 2%, lock in that profit, and take the next three years off. I just have one question. Why? The world continues to face the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression. Unemployment throughout Europe is over ten percent. Entire national governments are on the verge of going broke. Why would anyone think that THE THING THAT WE HAVE TO DO RIGHT NOW is to hand out $645 billion in more funny money to the banks? In Europe or anywhere else? The ECB is a public institution. How can it possibly justify yet another bailout for selfish private interests, while the public is sent straight to hell? If a Martian were to land in Paris today, and just read the headlines of the newspapers today, he could reach only one conclusion. That there has been a coup in Europe, the banks are now in charge, and they’re grabbing everything that they can get their hands on. Mark my words: at some point, people are just not going to take it anymore. Courage, Alan Grayson

The Holiday Family Video Every American Needs To See

The Holiday Family Video Every American Needs To See

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Lawmaker Says Michelle Obama Has ‘Large Posterior’ - FishbowlDC

Lawmaker Says Michelle Obama Has ‘Large Posterior’ - FishbowlDC

Food and media companies donated generously to lawmakers opposing food marketing guidelines for kids - Sunlight Foundation Reporting Group

Food and media companies donated generously to lawmakers opposing food marketing guidelines for kids - Sunlight Foundation Reporting Group

Congressman Introduces Amendment to Get Money Out of Politics | | United RepublicUnited Republic

Congressman Introduces Amendment to Get Money Out of Politics | | United RepublicUnited Republic

Official Occupy Wall Street Thank You Video

TheTinyDot

The Holiday Card The GOP Is Sending To Their Gajillionaire Friends

The Holiday Card The GOP Is Sending To Their Gajillionaire Friends

Saturday, December 17, 2011

The Sacred Cow

This week the congress passed the Defense Department budget on a stand alone bill at a time when any other bill has some kind of (so called) poison pill attached to it. This leads me to believe that the DOD is able to freely acquire anything it wants, no strings attached. At a time when repubs in congress are intent in cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the DOD can just demand anything it wants from congress and it will be given to them. When will the dems get up the courage to attach the bills they want to pass to the DOD bill? We all know that it’s always the repubs driving the DOD bills and they won’t hesitate to attach a poison pill to any and every bill the dems want to pass. So let them cry unpatriotic if they desire to, at least the repubs will be confronted with their own actions. If they want stand alone bills, they need to provide the other side with the same opportunity. The dems need to stop caving to repub demands. If a dumb, uneducated person such as myself is able to figure this out why can’t those who are supposed to be the brightest that the dems have to offer do so? Or is there something going on behind the scenes, such as the dems are part of the conspiracy.
Is it better to create jobs making war and killing our fellow human beings or would the money be better used rebuilding our country? It’s a no-brainer, but you can’t tell!! The unemployment rate is close to nine percent and yet those with government jobs claim that government can not create jobs. As a matter of fact, as I write this article they are happily going about eliminating every else’s job in government, EXCEPT THEIR OWN. They have already given tax breaks to corporations to allow them to ship American manufacturing jobs overseas, now they are intent on destroying all other jobs. They want to starve government of funds to do anything for it’s citizens and in the process secretly erode our constitutional rights. We are in a struggle right now to keep our right to assembly and the right to due process of the law. They want us to fend for ourselves while they themselves live high on the government. If you are a soldier or in congress, you are in the only occupations they want the government to help, and if the soldiers weren’t fighting and dying they also would fall outside of this category. Mr. President, it’s time to not only PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE, but to also PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE (they seem to conveniently forget that part) of the citizens of this country. Put the sacred cow into the fire!!

Friday, December 16, 2011

Huge Profits, No Taxes

Public Campaign Donate NowFollow us On:YouTubeTwitterFacebook HomeFair FactsGet InvolvedVoter BlogPress RoomAbout UsSearch this site:
For Hire: Lobbyists or the 99%?
How Corporations Pay More for Lobbyists Than in Taxes
December 2011
(Download the full report)

Executive Summary

Amidst a growing federal deficit and widespread economic insecurity for most Americans, some of the largest corporations in the country have avoided paying their fair share in taxes while spending millions to lobby Congress and influence elections. This report builds on a recent report on corporate tax dodging by Citizens for Tax Justice by examining lobbying expenditure data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics. We also look at publicly available data on job creation, federal campaign contributions, and executive compensation, to understand how these corporations have been spending their cash.

Key Findings

•The thirty big corporations analyzed in this report paid more to lobby federal policymakers than they paid in federal income taxes for the three years between 2008 and 2010, despite being profitable.
•Despite making combined profits totally $164 billion in that three-year period, the 30 companies combined received tax rebates totaling nearly $11 billion.
•Altogether, these companies spent nearly half a billion dollars ($476 million) over three years to lobby Congress—that’s about $400,000 each day, including weekends.
•In the three-year period beginning in 2009 through most of 2011, these large firms spent over $22 million altogether on federal campaigns.
•These corporations have also spent lavishly on compensation for their top executives ($706 million altogether in 2010).
(Download the full report)
.

Cut the Pentagon's Budget, Make the U.S. Safer - OtherWords

Cut the Pentagon's Budget, Make the U.S. Safer - OtherWords

Is Iran Iraq All Over Again? - OtherWords

Is Iran Iraq All Over Again? - OtherWords

The Non-Threat From Iran!

Once again those in government are trying to sell us, the citizens a bill of goods They want to goad us to war in Iran the way they did in Iraq. In Iraq it was WMD and none ware found. Now they claim that Iran is close to a nuclear bomb. How can we possibly trust those intelligence claims after they have caused the country to go bankrupt fighting for a lie. They claimed no nation building, but what did they do; nation building! We built up Iraq’s infrastructure even while the infrastructure of our own country was falling apart and they refuse to do anything to repair it to this very day . They claimed that the entire war would cost only $50 to $80 billion. The cost was close to $1 trillion. They claimed that Iraq’s own oil money would pay for the war. Did it? No! They claimed that the war would be over in only a few months. How long did we stay there? Very nearly ten years! They claim that Iraq was hiding aircraft under the desert sands. Never found. They claimed that Iraq was trying to purchase something called yellowcake uranium from some country in Africa. Proven untrue! And these are only a few of many, many lies told to us by the intelligence community under the Bush administration. So why should we believe anything they say?
But now the Obama administration seems almost ready to go along with the right wing in starting up a groundswell of accusations against Iran in order to have an excuse to go to war with Iran. I pray that Mr. Obama would not give in to the intellectual coercion that is being perpetrated upon him. Mr. President, Mr. Ahmedinajad was a witness to what happened to Saddam Huessein and Osama Bin Laden and I’d be willing to bet $10,000 that even if he does possess nuclear weapons, he wouldn’t dare use them. Mr President the American people are tired of these wars! If you want to be elected for another I would advise you to concentrate on the economy. Let those who are not in power worry about going to war. That’s the very reason they are not there now.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

The Beginning Of A Coalition

Repubs Have A Good Point On This One!!

Republican Senators Push False Argument That Payroll Tax Cut Will Undermine Social Security: pAs some Republicans, including Majority Leader Eric Cantor (VA), are growing worried that opposing a payroll tax cut extension will undercut their message as anti-tax zealots, other Republicans have opposed the extension at every turn. Despite their staunch opposition to raising taxes on millionaires, these Republicans have cycled through the reasons to avoid providing a [...]/p

License to Profit: Legalized Corruption in the US Congress | Truthout

License to Profit: Legalized Corruption in the US Congress Truthout

Cuomo Strikes Deal to Raise Taxes on the Wealthiest | Truthout

Cuomo Strikes Deal to Raise Taxes on the Wealthiest Truthout

Robert Reich:

Robert Reich:

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Obama's "Free Trade" Follies: A Conversation With Global Trade Watch | Truthout

Obama's "Free Trade" Follies: A Conversation With Global Trade Watch Truthout

Exploiting Affinity to Combat US Protest | Truthout

Exploiting Affinity to Combat US Protest Truthout

Patriot Millionaires: Let the Bush Tax Cuts Expire Once and for All | Truthout

Patriot Millionaires: Let the Bush Tax Cuts Expire Once and for All Truthout

Time to Retake Politics From the One Percent in Both Political Parties | Truthout

Time to Retake Politics From the One Percent in Both Political Parties Truthout

Occupy Elections, With a Simple Message | Truthout

Occupy Elections, With a Simple Message Truthout

The Photo Proving The GOP Will Do Anything To Get Rid Of Obama, Even If It Hurts America

The Photo Proving The GOP Will Do Anything To Get Rid Of Obama, Even If It Hurts America

Alan Grayson (High Quality Version): Is Anyone Minding the Store at the ...

http://myemail.constantcontact.com/Candidate-Qualifying-for-Louisiana-DSCC---DPEC-open-Dec-7-9.html?soid=1102448202033&aid=ABQ32gA_NgY

http://myemail.constantcontact.com/Candidate-Qualifying-for-Louisiana-DSCC---DPEC-open-Dec-7-9.html?soid=1102448202033&aid=ABQ32gA_NgY

Monday, November 28, 2011

Elizabeth Warren On Health Insurance: Only Multimillionaires Are Safe

Elizabeth Warren On Health Insurance: Only Multimillionaires Are Safe

The Supreme Court Cannot Have Its Own Conflict of Interest -- Justices Thomas and Scalia Must Recuse Themselves

Posted: 11/15/11 11:03 AM ET


The Supreme Court's recent decision to listen and eventually rule on the President's health care bill cannot and should not be viewed in a vacuum. After conflicting rulings in lower courts over whether or not the Affordable Care Act is constitutional, the highest legal body in the nation will now hear oral arguments next March on the issue, and is expected to reach a decision sometime in June. Though the Supreme Court may have the ultimate say-so in our legal processes, it's important to remember that it too must adhere to certain principles. And when SCOTUS Judge Clarence Thomas' wife is directly connected to an anti-health care lobbying group, and both he and Judge Antonin Scalia attend conservative fundraisers, they have no option but to recuse themselves. Last week, Scalia and Thomas were invited guests to the Federalist Society's 2011 Annual Dinner. A highly conservative organization whose sole purpose appears to be to regress our nation, the Federalist Society not only asked the two Supreme Court judges to attend, but placed their names on publicity materials and gave them speaking opportunities as well. Sitting at different tables, Scalia and Thomas were only separated by the table of Paul Clement - the attorney who will likely argue the case against the health care bill in front of the Supreme Court, and the man who got his start clerking for Scalia himself. If this isn't the most outrageous conflict of interest, then I don't know what is. Earlier this year, Judge Thomas finally released the details of his wife's income while working with the organization Liberty Central. A conservative political advocacy group, Liberty Central pushes for smaller government and other right-wing ideas - including a move to reverse the Affordable Care Act. Serving as President and CEO of Liberty Central, Thomas' wife, Virginia, received a salary of $150,000, and less than $15,000 from another anti-health care lobbying firm she started according to published reports of these financial disclosures. When this self-proclaimed 'ambassador to the Tea Party movement' is the wife of a sitting judge on the U.S. Supreme Court set to rule on the very issue she championed against, how can the American people not object? Our judicial system was designed to serve as a forum whereby legal challenges and disputes could be resolved in a fair and just manner. And in order to maintain a certain level of equality, higher courts were established as a check on lower courts in an effort to provide impartiality on the day's pressing issues. As the most powerful court in the land, the Supreme Court is the final word on legal conflicts and as such, its judges are held to the highest of standards. Not only do they possess this immense responsibility and authority, but the Supreme Court also sets precedent for how lower courts may behave in the future. Throughout history, judges in various courts have often times recused themselves when there was an apparent conflict of interest in a case. You don't need a juris doctorate to realize that Thomas and Scalia should do the same now. As one of the first moves of his Presidency, Barack Obama immediately began advocating for a change to our health care system. After significant, seemingly endless pushback from conservatives, he compromised in several areas and presented the public with a health care act that still provided comprehensive reform. No longer could insurance companies discriminate against children with pre-existing conditions, kids could remain on their parents' insurance until the age of 26 and many other benefits would go into effect within the next few years. As White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer highlighted on Monday, one million more young Americans now have health insurance, women are getting mammograms and preventative services without paying an extra penny out of their own pocket and insurance companies have to spend more of people's premiums on health care instead of advertising and bonuses. But let's remember that this isn't about the President or about partisan politics. With at least 50 million Americans suffering without adequate health care in the most powerful nation, the Affordable Care Act was the initial step towards creating a more humane and honest system. I am not discussing this issue as a Democrat, but as someone who is concerned about the tens of millions - many of them children and the elderly - suffering without the ability to see a doctor. As I said before, this isn't about Obama; it's about our mama. Judges are sworn to uphold the law and to do so in an unbiased manner. But when you have two individuals who openly support right-wing causes and attend conservative fundraising events, we open ourselves to a clear frontal partisan attack in our judicial process. After the health care legislation was passed, there were those that objected and some that lobbied and took their battles to court. One of those individuals lobbying was Virginia Thomas. And now the court with the final word must decide if it will allow judges with such a blatant conflict of interest to rule on this vital issue. Judge Clarence Thomas and Judge Antonin Scalia must remove themselves from hearing these cases. It is the only way we can have a fair, objective ruling on perhaps the most pertinent legislation of our time.

DC as ATM: Newt, the Ultimate Beltway Swindler | Truthout

DC as ATM: Newt, the Ultimate Beltway Swindler Truthout

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Bank Of America Pledges To Sometimes Stop Doing Stuff That Robs Customers Blind

Bank Of America Pledges To Sometimes Stop Doing Stuff That Robs Customers Blind

16 Easy Ways To Remove Budgety Deficit

InstPolicyStudies

16. The easiest cut: stop funding grants to foreign governments to buy U.S.-made weapons.
»
InstPolicyStudies

15. We can cut the new nuclear bomber and tactical weapons in Europe for $2 billion per year.
»
InstPolicyStudies

14. If we were to cut outsourcing to defense contractors by 15%, we could save $30 billion this year.
»
InstPolicyStudies

13. By reducing inefficiencies in , then we can reduce its overall budget by $20 billion.
»
InstPolicyStudies

12. Save $8 billion per year: Eliminate two air force wings that only address past threats:
»
InstPolicyStudies

11. New missiles, submarines, and strike fighters are a waste of money: We can save $22 billion per year if we stop.
»
InstPolicyStudies

10. We can vastly reduce our nuclear warhead arsenal to save $21 billion per year:
»
InstPolicyStudies

9. To save $11 billion each year, we can eliminate our remaining operations in Iraq
»
InstPolicyStudies

8. We can eliminate 1/3 of our military bases in Europe and Asia to save $10 billion each year.
»
InstPolicyStudies

7. End the War in Afghanistan to save Americans $122 billion per year.
»
InstPolicyStudies

We're sharing our prescriptions for the fiscal crisis to show the U.S. is not broke. Help us spread our data and use to discuss.
»
InstPolicyStudies

6. Create a new tax bracket for those making more than $1 million per year.
»
InstPolicyStudies

@
We are not accusing you of breaking any laws, . If you claim you don't use tax havens, tell us what you pay in fed taxes.
»
InstPolicyStudies

5. Levy a progressive estate tax on the 1%: New $35 billion in revenue per year.
»
InstPolicyStudies

4. The stock option loophole creates lavish CEO rewards. Close the loophole: Money for people, not CEOs.
»
InstPolicyStudies

3. Stop tax haven abuse by corporations like and : $100 billion/year
»
InstPolicyStudies

2. Apply a levy on biggest banks. supports it. Banks deserve it.
»
InstPolicyStudies

1. The a.k.a. financial transactions tax: $150 billion/year of new revenues.
»
InstPolicyStudies

The U.S. is . Our report highlights 24 fiscal reforms that could make a difference: